Drawing on decades old rumors and generations worth of ugly stereotypes that all black men are out-of-control sexual predators, Politico has begun the “high tech lynching” of Republican Presidential front-runner Herman Cain.
The Cain campaign is strongly
denying (“denouncing” is probably a better word) a Politico smear that Cain was twice accused of sexual harassment decades ago when he was head of the National Restaurant Association. The thinly sourced report goes on to say that the women were paid “five figures” (each!) by the association for their silence.
It appears that Mitt Romney isn’t going to take Cain’s rise in the polls sitting down. Just tell me now, Mitt, was there any pubic hair on any cans of Coke?
I’m not a Cain supporter, but this kind of filthy anonymous attack is something all conservatives (and even Republicans) should stand firmly and loudly against. Attack 9-9-9, the abortion answer and his confusion on Israel. Beat him on the issues. This benefits no one.
Of course, the anonymous smears get top billing in the Politico report, and all of this information is on Page 4.
Ron Magruder, Denise Marie Fugo and Joseph Fassler, the chair, vice chair and immediate past chairman of the National Restaurant Association board of directors at the time of Cain’s departure, said they hadn’t heard about any complaints regarding Cain making unwanted advances.
“I have never heard that. It would be news to me,” said Fugo, who runs a Cleveland, Ohio, catering company, adding such behavior would be totally out of character for the Cain she knew. “He’s very gracious.”
Fassler, who helped bring Cain on board as CEO of the restaurant association, said that any inappropriate behavior was not brought to his attention and that he would be upset to learn it had gone on and he was not made aware of it.
“That’s a shock to me,” Fassler said. “As an officer during all of Herman’s years there as a paid executive… none of that stuff ever surfaced to me. Nobody ever called me, complained about this, nor did I ever hear that from Peter Kilgore, nor did I ever hear that from Herman Cain.”
Fassler – who ran a Phoenix food-service company and finished his term as chairman the month before Cain’s June 1999 departure but remained on the board’s executive committee – described Cain as treating men and women identically and asserted it was “not within his character” to make unwanted advances. “It’s not what I know of him,” Fassler said.
Much like Fassler, almost all board members remember Cain fondly and say he left on good terms.
Cain was “extremely professional” and “fair” to female staffers at the restaurant association, recalled Lee Ellen Hayes, who said she “worked fairly closely with” Cain in the late 1990s, when she was an executive at the National Restaurant Association Education Fund, a Chicago-based offshoot of the group.
Cain’s treatment of women was “the same as his treatment of men. Herman treated everyone great,” said Mary Ann Cricchio, who was elected to the board of the restaurant group in 1998. She said Cain left such a good impression on the organization that when he spoke at a group event in January of this year, as he was considering a presidential bid, “he had unanimous support in the room.”