Obama Advisor Hilary Rosen Attacks Ann Romney Over Motherhood

Hilary Rosen, who works for a firm that’s heavily involved in Barack Obama’s reelection campaign, launched a personal attack against Ann Romney on CNN tonight, saying Romney had no right to an opinion on economic matters because she has “never actually worked a day in her life.”

You may remember Rosen as the shrew-like head of the RIAA who wanted to throw teenagers and grandmothers in jail for using Napster. She currently works at a PR firm that is run by none other than Anita Dunn, Barack Obama’s Chairman Mao loving former communications director. That firm is “heavily involved” in the campaign to reelect failed President Obama.

Rosen’s shocking statements are already being called a “War on Moms.”  Most, though obviously not Rosen, would argue that raising 5 children is actually a lot of work.  More work than sitting on your fat ass in front of a CNN camera, at least.

What you have is Mitt Romney running around the country saying, “Well, my wife tells me what women really care about are economic issues.” And, “When I listen to my wife, that’s what I’m hearing.” Guess what? His wife has never actually worked a day in her life. She’s never really dealt with the economic issues that a majority of the women in this country are facing—in terms of how do we feed our kids, how do we send them to school, and how do—why we worry about their future.

Dana Loesch adds…

Rosen also rejects that any workplace inequality is the direct result of women’s own choices, something studies already confirmed. It’s an interesting position Rosen takes: she holds no regard for women’s choices that don’t match her own and she wants to blame men for those choices that women make.

4 thoughts on “Obama Advisor Hilary Rosen Attacks Ann Romney Over Motherhood

  1. FX Phillips says:

    Here is a little screed I posted elsewhere.

    If Mrs Romney interjects herself into the campaign or if Willard cites her as a source or is used as some other political prop then she is fair game to be discredited just like any other spokesman. This includes Michelle and her angry black women in training.

    The “human shield” tactic of politics perfected by the left and used incessantly to try and shield abominable policies is an obscenity. However in a way I am indulging in a little schendenfreude as to the NDSWP’s consternation as it is used against them.

    That being said I don’t condemn the intellectual whore Rosen(intellectual whore because her position was exactly the opposite when it came to Michelle) for trying to discredit her opponent but by doing in such a tone deafly ignorant, condescending and transparently politically opportunistic way.

    The left again show it’s “pro-choice” bona fides as they actively disparage and calumniate choices which don’t align with the shibboleths of their religion of the “Church of State”. They are all for choice along as it is the state approved choice.This is the hallmark of the elitist totalitarians as that falsely represent themselves to be the champions of choice all the while making sure you only have the choice they want you to make or the wrath of the state.

    Understand the tactical position that team Obama is making with this selective support. They see the linebacker-ish(in both size and disposition)first lady as an asset and potential spokemsan for the campaign and wish to place her above criticism and put whatever she says beyond debate. This can not be allowed although I can see the Romney campaign falling for this misdirection. Mrs Romney will never be accorded such deference regardless of the sympathetic figure she cuts and the venom will be allowed to take affect long before any denunciations take place.

    Michelle Antoinette gets fawning coverage every where she goes and this is not the first time Ann Romney has been attacked in the main stream press. After all Mrs Obama is allowed to get away with hateful tripe like “this is the first time I have ever been proud of my country” when her malignantly destructive marxist husband was garnering the NDSWP, nomination not to mention her imperious and pompous attitude which she brings to any issue she touches(nutrition) but Mrs Romney is dragged through the muck a the platitudinous interview that she gave during the primaries and is demeaned by a shallow political hack because she didn’t make the choices that the totalitarian gender war feminists deem as imbuing you with credibility.

    Funny I thought that in the leftist world all choices are equally valid? Another leftist first principle shot to hell on the rocks of political expediency.

    I believe she also tried to float the transparently false notion that the NDWSP was not using the discredited and totally fabricated in the Whitehouse “war on women”. She is a completely cynical and dishonest interlocutor just like her masters in the NDSWP hierchy.

    • Steven says:

      I agree that, if the candidates make the wives and children a part of the campaign, then the wives and children should be fair game. However, those are not the rules the other side set out and enforced on us the last time around (while ignoring them in their own communications), and we’re done playing by their rules while they play by none.

      Alinsky Rule 4. “Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.”

      They’re going to dictate these rules, so, fine, we’re going go ahead and shove their rules back down their throats. This RIAA Rosen pig can choke on “leave the families out of it.”

      Enlighten me on what NDSWP is. I’m guessing it’s something like National Democratic Socialist Workers Party, but that’s just a guess.

  2. FX Phillips says:

    Steven asks

    Enlighten me on what NDSWP is. I’m guessing it’s something like National Democratic Socialist Workers Party, but that’s just a guess.

    That is exactly it. It is acceptable shorthand in a lot of places I comment. If you wish me not to use it I will honor your request. After all this is your place.

    I agree with you wholeheartedly. You know what they say ,if standards are good then double standards must be twice as good.

    As I said in my comment this whole thing may be a set up to inoculate Mrs Obama from criticism as they feed her with half truths, whole lies and obnoxious talking point. I am not the only one who thinks this. And trust me when I say that when I agree with Karl Rove I recheck all my assumptions to make sure psychiatric help is not warranted.

    I am well aware they have no intention of honoring the “rules of the game”. This is why I say attack Ms Rosen on the asininity of her comment and her open hypocrisy of when she ruled the big MO out of bounds 4 years ago when MO was clearly electioneering for the empty suit in chief. Do not even give them a millimeters wiggle room on this. They think the pompous and petulant first linebacker is an asset. We need to be able to attack her just like any other surrogate. Otherwise she just becomes a “stunt victim” which the Un-democratic party has become noted for.

Comments are closed.